Spotify back up after outage hits over 40,000 users
Former Dallas police officer Amber Guyger now eligible for parole six years after murder
‘It felt risqué:’ How a computer dating service launched in 1965 changed our love lives
Pakistanis protesting Hezbollah leader's killing clash with Karachi police
Iran's president denounces Israeli attacks on Tehran's regional allies
Israel used US-made bomb in attack on Hezbollah head, US senator says
China to cut existing mortgage rates by end-Oct, cities ease home-buying curbs
Packers QB Love available to play; CB Jaire Alexander out Sunday against Vikings
Alabama overtakes Texas for No. 1 and UNLV earns its 1st ranking in program history
‘LibraryTok’ is building school-age nostalgia on the internet. Fans can’t get enough
LONDON (Reuters) -Tata Steel could take steps to pause or stop some blast furnace operations earlier than planned at its plant in Port Talbot, Wales, while it challenges the legal basis for a strike organised by trade union Unite.
Unite said last week that around 1,500 workers would begin an indefinite strike from July 8 over Tata's plans to close two blast furnaces and cut up to 2,800 jobs.
"Following the announcement by Unite Union to unilaterally call strike action from 8 July, Tata Steel is unfortunately forced to commence legal action to challenge the validity of Unite's ballot," a Tata Steel spokesperson said in a statement.
"In the coming days, if we cannot be certain that we are able to continue to safely and stably operate our assets through the period of strike action, we will not have any choice but to pause or stop heavy end operations - including both blast furnaces - on the Port Talbot site."
The closures were announced in January as part of the Indian company's plan to turn around its loss-making UK business by switching to lower carbon electric arc furnaces, a proposal backed by 500 million pounds ($632 million) of government money.
Responding to the latest Tata statement, Unite General Secretary Sharon Graham said:
"Tata putting out a statement to shut or pause its blast furnaces three months earlier than they intended to is the latest in a long line of threats that won't deter us."
(Reporting by William James; additional reporting by Harshita Meenaktshi in Bengaluru; editing by Chris Reese, Alexander Smith and Sandra Maler)
