Social Security cost-of-living benefits increase announcement coming Thursday
Seven & i may establish holding company for non-core assets, says Yomiuri
Stock market today: Asian shares rise after Wall Street rally, and China promises a briefing
Indonesia's Prabowo defends plan to expand government with 'fat' cabinet
Groundbreaking held for first exclusive Muslim cemetery in Minnesota
A New York village known for its majestic mute swans faces a difficult choice after one is killed
Lindor's grand slam sends Mets into NLCS with 4-1 win over Phillies in Game 4 of NLDS
Close call at Nashville airport came after planes were directed to same runway, probe shows
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — South Carolina’s new all-male Supreme Court reversed course on abortion on Wednesday, upholding a ban on most such procedures after about six weeks of pregnancy.
The 4-1 ruling departs from the court’s own decision earlier this year to strike down a similar law.
The continued erosion of legal abortion access across the U.S. South comes after Republican state lawmakers replaced the lone female on the court, Justice Kaye Hearn.
Writing for the new majority, Justice John Kittredge acknowledged that the 2023 law infringes on “a woman’s right of privacy and bodily autonomy,” but said the state legislature reasonably determined this time around that those interests don't outweigh “the interest of the unborn child to live.”
“As a Court, unless we can say that the balance struck by the legislature was unreasonable as a matter of law, we must uphold the Act,” Kittredge wrote.
It was Hearn who wrote the majority’s lead opinion in January striking down the ban. The court ruled then that the law violated the state constitution’s right to privacy.
Hearn then reached the court’s mandatory retirement age, enabling the Republican-dominated legislature to put Gary Hill on what is now the nation’s only state Supreme Court with an entirely male bench.
With a newly configured Supreme Court, Republican lawmakers enacted a new abortion law in 2023 that they thought would pass muster a second time around. Specifically, the law was crafted to address Justice John Few’s concern, expressed in the January ruling, that lawmakers failed to take into account whether the abortion restrictions were reasonable enough to infringe upon privacy rights in favor of the right to life.
Abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood South Atlantic, sued again.
Hill joined Wednesday's majority along with Few, who had previously voted to overturn the 2021 law.
Since the U.S. Supreme Court last year overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 ruling that provided nationwide access to abortion, most GOP-controlled states have enacted or adopted abortion bans of some kind. All have been challenged in court.
