Analysis – Dissanayake's push for Sri Lanka economic change leaves IMF deal, debt rework in limbo
BOJ chief signals no rush in raising rates further
JPMorgan bullish on India and Japan, top Asia official says
West Africa becomes global terrorism hotspot as Western forces leave
Pope asks for liberation of Myanmar's detained ex-leader Suu Kyi
China rolls out broad rate cuts and other stimulus to spur weak economy
Hello, I'm Johnny Cash's statue: A monument to the singer is unveiled at the US Capitol
Rookie Jayden Daniels nearly flawless for Commanders in 38-33 win over Bengals
Josh Allen throws 4 TD passes and the Bills roll to a 47-10 win over the unraveling Jaguars
MOSCOW (Reuters) - Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov said on Tuesday that the involvement of the United States in Ukraine's ongoing incursion into Russia's western Kursk region was "an obvious fact", the TASS state news agency reported.
Washington says it was not informed about Ukraine's plans ahead of its Aug. 6 incursion into Kursk. The United States has also said it did not take any part in the operation.
Ryabkov said that it was no longer an accusation that the United States was involved but "an obvious fact."
"Washington's escalatory path is becoming more and more challenging," Ryabkov said, according to Russian news agencies.
"The impression is that (U.S.) colleagues have thrown away the remnants of common sense and believe that everything is permissible for them. Similar approaches are followed by their clientele in Kyiv."
Ryabkov said such action could lead to serious consequences in terms of Russia's own reaction and that Washington was aware of how Moscow could respond.
Russia has said that Western weaponry, including British tanks and U.S. rocket systems, have been used by Ukraine in Kursk. Kyiv has confirmed using U.S. HIMARS missiles to take out bridges in Kursk.
The New York Times reported that the United States and Britain provided Ukraine with satellite imagery and other information about the Kursk region in the days after the Ukrainian attack.
The Times said that the intelligence was aimed at helping Ukraine keep better track of Russian reinforcements that might attack them or cut off their eventual withdrawal back to Ukraine.
(Reporting by Reuters; Writing by Lucy Papachristou and Guy Faulconbridge; Editing by Andrew Osborn)
